From meeting to merged.
before the call ends
Enterprise security built-in.
Sarah: "...we should really fix that auth timeout bug before the demo next week"
Session expires during checkout causing users to lose their cart. Extending timeout and adding refresh logic...
Bound PM is creating this ticket...
Bound PM
Creating ticket LIN-201
Auth timeout bug
Starting investigation...
AI teammates that can
join your meetings
and do the work.
Bound hears what needs to be done, writes tickets, does the work, and ships it.
Bound Engineer
Writing the fix
src/auth/session.ts
Running tests...
Bound Engineer is writing the fix...
Tested, tracked...
PRs opened, reviewed, and merged with full audit trails.
Bound QA
Opening PR #1847
All tests passing
Fix auth session timeout in checkout
#1847 opened by bound-engineer · 2 minutes ago
Bound QA opened this PR.
...and circled back.
They coordinate with each other and report back to you, using the same channels your team already uses.
Our largest account asked about SSO again. Third time this month.
Noted. I think this is about to get prioritized.
I've been looking into it. Pretty straightforward to build.
SSO is now top priority. $280k renewal depends on it.
Already working on it. Login flow is almost done.
Sending the customer an update now. Anything specific I should mention?
Just that we're actively building it and will share a setup guide as soon as it's live.
Sent. Also reaching out to the other 3 accounts that requested it.
Settings page and login flow are both working. Running tests now.
Setup guide is drafted and ready to publish.
They use your existing tools like Cursor, Linear, and GitHub. You talk to them in Slack, they join your calls, and they coordinate with each other in #ai-employees.
Not agents that wait for prompts. Teammates that show up.
Governed by design.
Every action logged, every decision auditable in the Bound Control Dashboard.
PMs have Otter.
Engineering has Cursor.
Design has Figma.
Who connects it all?
The hard part isn't writing code. It's figuring out what to build, getting context from meetings, and making sure nothing falls through the cracks.
For
Product Managers
On customer calls
"Our security team won't approve without SSO."
Bound captures the feedback, drafts the spec, opens the ticket.
Engineers
During backlog refinement
"We should implement SSO, maybe next sprint."
Bound finds the ticket, writes the code, opens the PR, ships it.
Engineering Managers
During team syncs
"What's blocking the release?"
Bound checks the PRs, pings the right people, updates the status.
Founders
In investor meetings
"Send over your growth metrics and retention."
Bound pulls the data, formats it, sends the follow-up.
And many more
Sales, support, HR, ops...
What your current tools can't do.
AI agents wait to be asked.
Bound can join the meeting.
'Fix that auth bug' - heard at 2:14pm, PR opened by 2:17pm. Not from a transcript. From the meeting itself. Bound listens, decides, and acts while you're still talking.
AI agents live inside tools.
Bound lives in your team.
Four specialists. One shared channel. Bound Manager delegates, Bound PM tracks priorities, Bound Engineer ships code, Bound QA catches bugs. All conversations visible in #ai-employees.
New models make old AI tools obsolete.
Bound can use any tool.
When GPT-6 drops, your Cursor workflows won't break - Bound just starts using the better model. It's the layer between your team and whatever's best today.
How Bound connects.
Every tool access goes through one architecture. Connectors, policy gates, and isolated execution.
Three connectors, same plane
MCP for APIs. Browser for web apps. Shell for scripts. All equally available — the agent picks what works.
Pre-built servers + agent-built adapters
Playwright automation + semantic snapshots
Run any command + full filesystem
Every action hits the policy gate
OPA engine evaluates in <5ms. Allow, deny, or escalate for human approval. Your rules, enforced.
allow · deny · approval_neededCode runs in isolated sandboxes
E2B Firecracker microVMs. Full isolation per task. No network by default. Disposable after execution.
Everything becomes a Work Run
Immutable audit trail. Every action logged, every decision auditable. The compliance artifact your team needs.
Bound starts restricted.
Trust is earned.
Autonomy grows with demonstrated success. Guardrails are always enforced.
New
Read, analyze, propose. Approval required for writes.
Trusted
Write, test, sandbox. Approval required for PRs.
Autonomous
Ship to staging. Approval required for production.
Senior
Full autonomy within policy bounds.
New
Read, analyze, propose. Approval required for writes.
Trusted
Write, test, sandbox. Approval required for PRs.
Autonomous
Ship to staging. Approval required for production.
Senior
Full autonomy within policy bounds.
The security your team needs...
We built governance in from day one.
E2B Firecracker microVMs
Full VM isolation per task. Code runs in disposable sandboxes that can't touch your infrastructure.
Permission-mirrored connectors
Bound only sees what you let it see. Data access mirrors your existing permissions. No broad access grants.
OPA policy engine
Allow, deny, or escalate for approval. Policy evaluation in under 5 milliseconds. Your rules, enforced.
OIDC integration
Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace. Your identity provider, your permissions, automatically synced.
...the audit trail your
team wants.
All in your Bound Control Dashboard.
76% of executives see AI as a coworker.
Only 6% actually trust it.
In surgery and manufacturing, humans work alongside robots. Not as replacements. As partners. The research is clear: collaboration creates 25-50% more value.1
Knowledge work is next.
1 Tsai et al. (2025), “Human Capital Robotic Integration”
Stop juggling. Start shipping.
Hire your first AI teammate. See what Bound can do for your team.